The race is on to determine whether a waterfront park in Fernandina Beach finally becomes a reality.
The Fernandina Beach City Commission Tuesday voted 4-1 to spend $95,000 to hire a firm to complete engineering plans for construction of the park.
Prior to the vote, opponents of building the park told commissioners why the park was a bad idea citing a lack of adequate parking in the Historic Downtown. They said they have marshaled a formal group to collect signatures to have the issue placed on the ballot for a vote by residents.
"In short, this park makes the waterfront accessible for all," said Mayor Bradley Bean. "If you are here, if you are concerned about parking, I have great news, this plan keeps every parking spot. In fact, it increases the number of boat trailer spots that it has."
Bean also said the permanent petanque courts were being removed to create a "flex" space to be used as the public deems necessary.
Following Bean's remarks, 15 speakers addressed the commission regarding the waterfront park proposal. Ten speakers, including three charter boat captains, said the park was a flawed concept.
Michael Sharpe and Mac Morris said they are leading a petition drive to have citizens vote on the waterfront park ordinance.
"I am part of a team that is going to put an ordinance for the city and to put voting on the waterfront plans to the citizens. And, to put it on the taxpayers who pay for everything including for the lights here" Morris said.
City Clerk Caroline Best said Sharpe has filed all of the necessary paperwork to begin the process of placing the waterfront park issue on the ballot. The next step for Sharpe and Morris is to collect approximately 1,100 petition signatures necessary to qualify as an election ballot measure.
"If you waste $100,000 of our taxpayer money on park plans (with us) having a very good, almost inescapable chance of collecting enough signatures to stop it...this will not pass voter muster," Sharpe said.
Charter boat Captain Allen Mills said the16 petanque courts currently take up 10,400 square feet of space.
"That's 38 and half more parking spaces we can have. You can put Sounds on Centre at the gazebo there. We could do the festival, the market would be awesome," he said. "You need to get parking. You have all kinds of restaurants being built, a new hotel coming in, they need parking. You're not doing anything about these attractions for parking."
John Abbott, a retired architect and officer of the local petanque club, was one of five speakers in support of the waterfront park plan.
"I'm 100 percent in favor of this park plan," he said. "I can tell you why park plans like this fail. They're too invested in complex geometries, maybe some exotic materials, a little bit over the top with their architectural components. This plan has none of that. This plan is very modest, very simple. It's very achievable."
Abbott urged the commission to "give this plan a chance."
"This plan, it's got a great balance of hardscape, landscape, open space, architectual elements that will equip the needs for recreation, relaxing and special events," he said,
Vice Mayor David Sturges, who voted against awarding the contract, opposed the petanque courts being included in the park.
"Even though I know it's a 'flex' space, I think that area needs to be parking," Sturges said prior to the vote.
Sturges said he also believed the petition drive to have voters decide the waterfront park proposal would succeed.
"I'll be among the 1,100 people signing a petition," he said.
Bean ended the discussion with "We're doing this because we need a place for the community to come together. And that again is what this park is."
The $1 million-plus cost of the park will be funded by city Parks and Recreation impact fees. There is currently a little more than $3 million in the fund.
Time will tell if the petition drive succeeds or not. I have supported a riverfront park since the first plans were approved back in 2012 after years of citizens' input. Sure, everyone has an element or two that they think is either missing or not needed, but the park will serve as a gathering spot for residents and visitors alike and provide a boost to the downtown business and residential community. Personally I think the number of petanque courts is excessive and believe the tournament could be held at Central Park, but every planner will tell you that using prime waterfront space for parking is absolutely the worst use of that property. The greatest impact on the parking is going…
Pétanque as well as pickleball is enjoyed by many citizens. There is not much in the way of sports for our older population and now they want to take that away. All we do is fight, argue, get angry, oppose and turn around and provide more housing. This cause me to shake my head and roll my eyes. Oh wait, I never have a problem with finding a parking space.